I have just received two very angry phone calls from Karina Mihaka and Michael Edmonds, both incensed that their association with Grant King has placed them front and centre for some serious scrutiny. Leaving aside the fact for a moment that the nature of their reaction speaks volumes, Mihaka and Edmonds inform me that they are off to the Police tomorrow to report me, to which my considered reply to them both was “Perfect”. I have also offered both parties the right of reply on this website to any allegations that may have been made against them, but in their incandescent fury, neither appeared to register this offer.
It may do Karina and Michael some good to read the following reply I penned to a reader who was enquiring (in part) about how big the net is getting regarding the amount of people who potentially may be “caught” in the GNK “net”.
My reply to the reader was as follows:
Thank you for your thoughtful and considered feedback.
My target has and will always be Grant Norman King t/a NZ Sleepouts.
If King had simply done the right thing by the law and by us, and paid us back our money that he fraudulently procured via dishonest and deceitful means, then all would have been well (with us at least) in his life.
The mistake King made was to assume that I would roll over, and that I would follow a process based on this assumption – basically, he both called what he thought was my bluff, which I am now sure in hindsight he will be aware was a very, very stupid thing to do.
In calling what the thought was my bluff, he has not not only exposed himself to the highest level and depth of public, media, and statutory scrutiny ( as I warned him would happen if the did not see us right on the multiple contract breaches he committed against us); he have also unwittingly placed anyone that remotely associates with him (sadly, including some members of King’s family) to the same level and depth of public, media, and statutory scrutiny, and re-enraged a large number of people who were King’s previous victims, who are now collectively fighting back – and are winning.
The smartest thing now that any of Grant Kings “associates” could do is to actually dis-associate themselves from King immediately, because the very serious formal sanctions that King has coming to him, such “associates” should not, and will not want any part of.
My target is King – no-one else: but if other people are going to insist on making the same mistake with me that King did – then I guess that decision is for them to make?
The person at the greatest risk right now with regard to the content of this website is Grant Norman King – let’s all keep it that way, shall we?